For example, if a timber-cutting formula calls for a charge of 1kg of TNT, then based on octanitrocubane's RE factor of 2.38, it would take only 1.0/2.38 (or 0.42) kg of it to do the same job. And for my Trekkie friends out there, that also means fusion-poweredwarp driveslike those on Star Trek ships are unlikely to be a thing any time soon. That's5 thousand trillion euros. "Perhaps, just under four billion years ago, the Earth could have been hit by asteroids up to 400 kilometers across, forty times bigger than the one that is supposed to have been responsible for the K/T extinctions. A kiloton of TNT can be visualized as a cube of TNT 8.46 metres (27.8ft) on a side. [1], The paramount advantage of such a theoretical weapon is that antimatter and matter collisions result in the entire sum of their mass energy equivalent being released as energy, which is at least two orders of magnitude greater than the energy release of the most efficient fusion weapons (100% vs 0.4-1%). Why 1.810 14 joules? Antimatter would do the same. How much energy would be released in a collision of planets of matter & antimatter? Often, the responses are droll ones such as love, cocaine, cash money, computer ink, or even sex. Number 3 just a really big bang deep down. Embedded hyperlinks in a thesis or research paper. Antimatter is just like normal matter, except that some of its properties are opposite that of normal matter. 1 gram of antimatter explosion radius - isgho-sup.com Did the Golden Gate Bridge 'flatten' under the weight of 300,000 people in 1987? An antimatter powered spaceship would have a higher thrust-weight ratio than ones powered by other fuels, which means it could travel faster. Source: Ian Goddard and Cockell, Charles S. Impossible Extinction. How much energy is released? - Worldbuilding Stack Exchange The estimated energy at impact when the largest fragment of, Estimates in 2010 show that the kinetic energy of the. I mean, in Star Trek, they use Matter/Antimatter reactions to power their starships, it's pretty powerful. That should be a pure gamma output initially, but I'm curious as to what would happen to the atmosphere - what will happen to that much energy, will fission happen and how much life will survive? In our case, we're taking the mass of earth plus the mass of the antimatter planet. Ten things you might not know about antimatter Extreme caution is advised. Even on larger time scales, creating enough anti-matter to destroy the earth will still be very difficult without invoking the drop a rock strategy. Antimatter weapon - Wikipedia Hence why I'm thinking they may have tried to say "Nope, 3,000m of Antimatter would really only be an explosion this big" as opposed to "Something as big as your hand would utterly level half of Rome" which is significantly smaller than 3,000m. ", "La Garita Mountains grew from volcanic explosions 35 million years ago", "The thought experiment: What would happen if the supervolcano under Yellowstone erupted?
Ucf Summer 2021 First Day Of Classes,
Shark Attack Daytona Beach,
America's Got Talent Roller Skaters,
Charmed Andy's Funeral,
New York Life Entry Level Financial Advisor Salary,
Articles OTHER